[DE] Teil 2 – Tabakkontrolle Bericht – Kernaussagen widerlegt

Das Paper der WHO-Tabakkontrolle, mit Sitz im DKFZ, stellt die dort hinterlegten Studien gerne als “alleiniger” Stand der Wissenschaft dar. Zumal auch oftmals Mini-Risiken zu Elefanten aufgeblasen werden und grundsätzlich der Vergleich zum Tabakrauchen unterlassen wird. Dies spiegelt nicht die Realität wider!
Daher wird hier in diesem Beitrag auf jedes Argument aus der Kurzzusammenfassung des DKFZ Dokuments mit Fakten gegengehalten.
Alleine schon der gesunde Menschenverstand sagt einem, wo keine Verbrennung, da keine schädlichen Verbrennungsgase! Eine rationale Herangehensweise kommt daher zu einem anderen Ergebnis: E-Dampfprodukte sind die beste Erfindung der aktuellen Zeit, denn mit ihrer Hilfe ist es möglich, die Schäden durch den Tabakkonsum zu reduzieren.

Kernaussagen widerlegt

Inhaltsstoffe in Liquids

Gesundheitsgefährdende Substanzen im E-Zigarettenaerosol

Gesundheitsrisiken durch den Gebrauch von E-Zigaretten

Abhängigkeit

Gesundheitliche Veränderungen

Gesundheitliche Belastung Dritter

E-Zigarettenkonsum Jugendlicher

E-Zigaretten in der Tabakentwöhnung

Umweltrisiken

Harm Reduction

Quellen

  1. Farsalinos et al.; Toxicity classification of e-cigarette flavouring compounds based on European Union regulation: analysis of findings from a recent study; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-019-0318-2 ; 2019
  2. Shein et al.; Comparison of Free Radical Levels in the Aerosol from Conventional Cigarettes, Electronic Cigarettes, and Heat-Not-Burn Tobacco Products; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00085; 2019
  3. Bitzer et al.; Free Radical Production and Characterization of Heat-Not-Burn Cigarettes in Comparison to Conventional and Electronic Cigarettes; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00088; 2020
  4. Farsalinos et al.; Detection and quantitative determination of heavy metals in electronic cigarette refill liquids using Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.035 ; 2018
  5. Polosa et al.; The effect of e-cigarette aerosol emissions on respiratory health: a narrative review; https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2019.1649146 ; 2019
  6. Caruso et al.; Electronic nicotine delivery systems exhibit reduced bronchial epithelial cells toxicity compared to cigarette: the Replica Project; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03310-y ; 2021
  7. Caruso et al.; In vitro cytoxicity profile of e-cigarette liquid samples on primary human bronchial epithelial cells; https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3275; 2022
  8. G. Phillips et al.: “A comparative in vitro toxicity assessment of electronic vaping product e-liquids and aerosols with tobacco cigarette smoke”; Toxicology in Vitro, Volume 66, August 2020, 104866; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104866
  9. Royal College of Physicians; Nicotine without Smoke; https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/nicotine-without-smoke-tobacco-harm-reduction; 2016
  10. Royal Society of Public Health; Nicotine no more harmful than caffeine; https://www.rsph.org.uk/about-us/news/nicotine--no-more-harmful-to-health-than-caffeine-.html; 2015
  11. Mayer; How much nicotine kills a human? Tracing back the generally accepted lethal dose to dubious self-experiments in the nineteenth century; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00204-013-1127-0; 2013
  12. Fagerström; A Comparison of Dependence across Different Types of Nicotine Containing Products and Coffee; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081609; 2018
  13. Newhouse et al.; Memory Improvement Through Nicotine Dosing (MIND) Study (MIND); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02720445; Läuft bis 07.2023
  14. Hedman et al.; Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With Smoking Habits, Demographic Factors, and Respiratory Symptoms; https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2688346; 2018
  15. Polosa et al.; COPD smokers who switched to e-cigarettes: health outcomes at 5-year follow up; https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2040622320961617; 2020
  16. Boulay et al.; Acute effects of nicotine-free and flavour-free electronic cigarette use on lung functions in healthy and asthmatic individuals; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0518-9; 2017
  17. Jacob George et al.: “Cardiovascular Effects of Switching From Tobacco Cigarettes to Electronic Cigarettes”; Am Coll Cardiol, 2019 Dec 24;74(25):3112-3120; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.067
  18. Stephens; Comparing the cancer potencies of emissions from vapourised nicotine products including e-cigarettes with those of tobacco smoke; https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/27/1/10; 2017
  19. Farsalinos; Cancer risk from e-cigarettes > 50 000 (thousand) fold lower than smoking; http://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/whats-new/2017/258-cancer; 2017
  20. Le Su et al.; Evaluation of the Effects of E-Cigarette Aerosol Extracts and Tobacco Cigarette Smoke Extracts on Human Gingival Epithelial Cells; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c07324 ; 2023
  21. Stewart et al.; Effects of tobacco smoke and electronic cigarette vapor exposure on the oral and gut microbiota in humans: a pilot study; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736335; 2018
  22. McDonnell et al.; 186: Electronic cigarette use in pregnancy is not associated with low birth weight or preterm delivery; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.207; 2019
  23. Glover et al.; Potential effects of using non-combustible tobacco and nicotine products during pregnancy: a systematic review; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00359-2; 2020
  24. Calder et al.; Vaping in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review; https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntab017; 2021
  25. IG-ED; Akkusicherheit in der Praxis; https://ig-ed.org/basiswissen/akkusicherheit/
  26. Franchitto et al.; Self-poisoning by e-cigarette and e-liquids: national reports to French Poison Control Centers from July 2019 to December 2020: VIGIlance and VAPE: the VIGIVAPE Study; https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad116; 2023
  27. Cox et al.; Nicotine and e-cigarettes: Rethinking addiction in the context of reduced harm; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.03.009; 2017
  28. Yingst et al.; Changes in Nicotine Dependence Among Smokers Using Electronic Cigarettes to Reduce Cigarette Smoking in a Randomized Controlled Trial; https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac153; 2022
  29. Szafran et al.; Addictive Potential of e-Cigarettes as Reported in e-Cigarette Online Forums: Netnographic Analysis of Subjective Experiences; https://doi.org/10.2196/41669; 2023
  30. O’Leary et al.; Respiratory and Cardiovascular Health Effects of e-Cigarette Substitution: Protocol for Two Living Systematic Reviews; https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/5/e29084; 2021
  31. BinShabaib et al.; Clinical periodontal status and gingival crevicular fluid cytokine profile among cigarette-smokers, electronic-cigarette users and never-smokers; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.05.001; 2019
  32. Lucchiari et al.; Benefits of e-cigarettes in smoking reduction and in pulmonary health among chronic smokers undergoing a lung cancer screening program at 6 months; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106222; 2020
  33. Boakye et al.; Examining the association of habitual e-cigarette use with inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in young adults: The VAPORS-Endothelial function study; https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/162327; 2023
  34. Goniewicz; Biomarkers of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) use; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100077; 2023
  35. Geiss et al.; Characterisation of mainstream and passive vapours emitted by selected electronic cigarettes; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.10.001; 2015
  36. Savdie et al.; Passive Exposure to Pollutants from a New Generation of Cigarettes in Real Life Scenarios; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103455; 2020
  37. Martin et al.; On the Passive Exposure to Nicotine from Traditional Cigarettes Versus e-Cigarettes; http://www.openscienceonline.com/journal/archive2?journalId=718&paperId=4979; 2019
  38. Etter; Gateway effects and electronic cigarettes; https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13924; 2017
  39. Hallingberg et al.; Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054584; 2018
  40. Gartner; E-cigarettes and youth smoking: be alert but not alarmed; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054002; 2018
  41. Etter; Dependence levels in users of electronic cigarettes, nicotine gums and tobacco cigarettes; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.007; 2015
  42. Hajek et al.; A Randomized Trial of E-Cigarettes versus Nicotine-Replacement Therapy; https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1808779; 2019
  43. McNeill; Should Clinicians Recommend E-cigarettes to Their Patients Who Smoke? Yes.; https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1962; 2016
  44. Hartmann-Boyce et al.; Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation; https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub4; 2020
  45. Britton et al.; A rational approach to e-cigarettes: challenging ERS policy on tobacco harm reduction; https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/55/5/2000166; 2020
  46. Thomas et al.; The Ethics of Tobacco Harm Reduction: An Analysis of E-Cigarette Availability From the Perspectives of Utilitarianism, Bioethics, and Public Health Ethics; https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa198; 2020
  47. Stöver et al.; Tobacco Harm Reduction - Diversifikation der Rauchentwöhnungsstrategien; https://www.frankfurt-university.de/de/hochschule/fachbereich-4-soziale-arbeit-gesundheit/forschung-am-fb-4/forschungsinstitute/institut-fuer-suchtforschung-isff/veranstaltungen-des-isff/4-e-zigaretten-konferenz/; 2021
  48. Balfour et al.; Balancing Consideration of the Risks and Benefits of E-Cigarettes; https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306416; 2021
  49. Levy et al.; Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of Competition ; https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad014; 2023

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert